Subscribe to RSS feed

Talking in Real-Time at #140conf

Two weeks from today, I will speak at #140conf Boston. What is #140conf, you ask?

[#140conf] will provide the attending delegates knowledge, perspectives and insights to the effects the real-time internet will have on both “we” the people, business and society.

That’s a fancy way of saying, “The internet is now. So how do we deal with it?”

Jeff Pulver, a self-described “communications visionary” (who is also unafraid to jump into a pool with his clothes on), is the powerhouse behind #140conf, an event he has taken (or will take) to New York, Tel Aviv, Detroit, LA and elsewhere. Jeff is a really nice, genuinely helpful guy, and #140conf promises to be full of good vibes and great ideas.

Check out the schedule for the daylong event. Some amazing speakers are lined up, including Steve Garfield, Julien Smith, CC Chapman and Christopher Penn (who, as the schedule currently stands, speaks right after me). There are also some incredible panels, such as the New England Media Panel featuring Adam Gaffin of Universal Hub and the Music Panel featuring none other than Amanda F—ing Palmer.

I’m honored and humbled to be part of such a stellar lineup. My topic is “Higher Ed in the Now: Building Our Brands in Real-Time.”

Here is a video I shot at the #140conf tweetup on June 22 of Jeff explaining what #140conf is all about. (You can also read my blog post recapping the tweetup and watch my video interviews with some social media notables talking about what they feel will be the big impact of the real-time web.)

The #140conf is only $140 (or perhaps cheaper), and for that amount you get to spend a day listening to some of the brightest minds on the web (plus me) talking about what real-time means for us all. It’s going to be special. I hope to see you there.

Somerville Local First: Hyper Local and Hyper Social

I am about to sign the lease and begin my eighth year of living in Somerville. I initially came here to live near friends, and while that’s still a draw, I’ve also become enamored with the community spirit and entrepreneurial culture that pervades the city.  A lot of that is shown through the vibrant arts scene, but local businesses are also strong and well organized here in Somerville, and a lot of that is due to Somerville Local First.

Somerville Local First launched in May 2008 with the goal of promoting local and sustainable economic development. The organization comprises 180 members, 140 of which are locally owned, independent businesses.

Over the course of this year, I’ve become more familiar with Somerville Local First, in part through their print publications and partnerships with local businesses, but also through their presence on the web. Their Twitter and Facebook presences are engaging and informative, keeping me in the loop about what businesses are up to around town and who is new to the area, and their blog – which launched along with their redesigned website last month – has quickly become a compelling and enlightening read. The blog brings together voices from the likes of dog owners, interns, policy researchers and local business owners on topics ranging from a review of a recent garden tour to the phenomenon of “local-washing.”

I spoke with Joe Grafton, the founding executive director of the nonprofit, about the approach that the small organization (Grafton is the only paid employee) has taken to communicating via the web and social media. Acknowledging that the organization can’t do everything or be everywhere at once, Grafton decided to focus Somerville Local First’s online presence on being an aggregator of content from around—and even outside—the city, all emphasizing local, sustainable economic development.

Beside their blog and social media accounts, Somerville Local First has also experimented with group buying (through the pilot Shift and Save coupon program) and plans to eventually devote a section of their website for people to access location-based specials in real-time via their mobile phones.

For Grafton, communicating via the web and social media is all about telling a story and having conversations, and using those engagements to advance the mission of Somerville Local First and support its members.

“I do feel that these channels are valuable and can create change in our community, which is why we choose to invest in them.”

The mission of SLF is to support local and sustainable economic development. How do you see social media supporting that mission?

I was at our national conference in Charleston this year—we’re affiliated with BALLE (Business Alliance for Local Living Economics)—and a colleague and friend from Local First Arizona talked about how she spends three to four nights a week at community meetings talking about Local First Arizona, where we as an organization just don’t have the resources to do that right now. Because we just don’t have the manpower to really manage our program and run the network in addition to doing outward community outreach and storytelling, we look at the web as our way to tell the story 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Lots of Somerville businesses and organizations are using Twitter. How do you, as an umbrella organization of sorts, seek to complement that and promote that?

In the world of new media and especially Twitter, we look at ourselves as content aggregators. There are a number of businesses that are part of our network using different channels – Facebook, Twitter, what have you – and we are the funnel all of it feeds into. What we try to do is provide a steady stream of information from our members to the people who follow us in that mechanism.

We also do different things on Twitter. We use it as a way to convey a message. It’s not just about promotion. Primarily we’re an educational organization. When we promote a business, we’re promoting it because we believe that if people are patronizing that business, the economy is doing better than if they weren’t. We share articles and knowledge with the community so that it’s not just about this promotion from business XYZ, but here’s what happens when you move you money to a local financial institution, or think about where your food comes from. By providing a rich diversified stream of content, what we hope people are following us on Twitter will do is have the ability to really see what’s happening in Somerville. As we think about new media, in a way we’re filling the role of some old media a — letting people know what’s happening in the community, but with a slant around local and sustainable.

Since launching, your blog has showcased a number of voices from across the community, covering a diverse range of topics. How did you go about planning for this blog and shaping its focus and content?

It started with us with really developing an understanding with HubSpot, which is one of the leaders in the country around inbound marketing. We did some education on our own and at that point we’d been using social media to push messages, but we thought, ‘What do we want people to do when they come to our site?’ We had a site which was good enough for a startup but not good enough. We were going to launch a new website anyways.

Our board members, who are running businesses or nonprofit organizations, can’t spend a huge amount of time developing the content. We’re big, big fans of watching what other people are doing, watching what works and copying it. You could look at the types of content and breadth of contributors and see the exact same plan as the Huffington Post. They have a huge number of people who are contributors. Every time someone gets something published there, they share it in their circle and drive traffic to the Huffington Post website and get the message out there. We thought that was a good model to follow.

We have four distinct categories of contributors – staff, board members and interns from Somerville Local First; Somerville Local First members, nonprofits, businesses, what have you; community bloggers and reporters — those are just writers who are interested in local and contribute to our blog from a number of angles; and third-party experts, people who may not necessary be in Somerville but have a very important role to play in the local movement around the country. As an organization that is really trying to be a leader in telling the story through the web, we thought having all these different communities contributing would add to vibrancy and make it more interesting for people to come back and see the content. But it all came out of, we don’t have enough time and resources to make this work, so let’s see what does work and emulate it.

“Local” as a theme is getting a lot of buzz today. How does the web, from your experience, help support the idea of local?

I think it’s so critical. There are a couple of reasons why its important. One of the main reasons is, we’re actually doing such a good job at changing the taste and the values of the customer base in the country that lots of non-local organizations are starting to adopt the wording and messaging around local.

What the web allows us to do is deliver a message that doesn’t have to come through a filter outside of our control. We’re not pitching a news story or article or TV segment that will be processed and delivered through the lens of producers or writers. We’re able to tell the story in a more authentic way and without compromise. I think that one piece is really having authenticity of the message.

Also, I think that maybe I’m an early adopter on this but I think so many people get their news through social media now as opposed to traditional channels, so it allows us to create things that are viral. Every time someone who is contributing to our blog or knows someone whose contributing to our blog sees something go online, that’s an opportunity where they might share that with their network. That may get people in their circle thinking about local and why it’s important and thinking about sustainability. The viral nature of news delivery on social media and the web allows for our message to multiply.

That’s where the real opportunity in social media and the web for us is getting that message virally shared and get closer to a point where the majority of people in our community care about local and there’s demand for entrepreneurs to come in and sell.

The Shift and Save coupons work like a hyperlocal Groupon. How did that idea come about and how successful was it?

Just looking at trends and what’s working in the market. [We asked,] how can we generate revenue for the network but provide a tangible benefit for business members through the website? How can we as an organization use our followers to support our message and support our members and support the organization?

We sold 100 coupons in just over a day, which was a total capacity of what we had to sell. That exceeded our expectation. We’re tracking the data to see whether or not this is actually going to be good for the businesses. I’m actually pretty unsure whether these group buying things are good for the businesses. We’re tracking things like, of people who bought coupons for Sherman Market, how many are new customers? When they bought with the coupon, what was the total order value? In time, we’ll have data to say how much it actually was good for the business. We’re dedicated to the fact that, after our testing, regardless of how much revenue or how quickly we sell, if it turns out the program doesn’t really benefit the businesses, we’re just not going to do it. Ultimately, we’re here to support local entrepreneurs and if group buying doesn’t do it, even on a hyper local basis, then we’re not going to do it.

What’s next for Somerville Local First on the web and in social media?

I do think that we are always striving to have conversations in all of these channels. We’re not just about broadcasting. People are really good at tuning out broadcasting and that’s not what we want to be. We like to ask questions and generate dialogue and have discussion.

We’re starting to get to the saturation point in our web channels with early adopters. We’ve got the early adopters invested in what we’re doing and contributing. As we start going outside of the circle, and group buying is one way we might do that. You’re reaching people not so into local but who are into saving money, and it generates more discussion and points of view.

I keep a strong eye on how we do with interactions and whether people are responding to what we’re posting about. When I look at other pages, I think we do really well but I know there’s a lot we can do. For the next six months, we’ll let what we’ve got roll and continue to try to improve it and keep our eye on trends, looking at location based services and see where the markets are going and do what we’ve done in the past which is look at what other people are doing that’s working and see if we can do that ourselves.

Blackberry Blues

I use to sheath my Blackberry in a protective silicone casing. Nowadays, that skin long shed, I am proud of its chips, its scuffs, even its scratches. I think of them as battle scars from a life lived on the go and on the web. My Blackberry has survived being dropped, punted and thrown around more times than I care to recount — but always with love.

I got my Blackberry last June, finally joining the smartphone world. I opted for the Blackberry over the iPhone because I couldn’t give up the idea of typing. I’ve typed my whole life; my fingers are used to the tactile feedback of buttons and keys. My iPad has enlightened me to a world of swiping, flipping and dragging, but I still love thumbing away on my Blackberry.

Over time, my Blackberry has transformed the way I conduct my personal business. It’s become an on-the-go office and production studio. I can catch up on Twitter, Facebook, e-mail, the news, even my blogs. I’ve drafted blog posts, responded to e-mails, planned my schedule for the week, posted to my mobile photo blog, shot and uploaded video, checked in on Foursquare, you name it. It’s hardy, versatile and, to me, essential.

Increasingly, though, it is feeling obsolete. And no matter how much abuse I heap upon it, it may be its own worst enemy, in the end.

It’s an iPhone and Android world nowadays, and much has been made of Blackberry’s relative absence from the fast-paced revolution currently taking place in the mobile phone space (though they’re apparently developing a competitor to the iPad).

The Blackberry still has its evangelists, of course, whether it’s via a post on Workshifting, which reveals the Blackberry as the authoring tool of choice for a successful author and a flashy rapper, or the paparazzi snapping a pic of Kim Kardashian BBMing away. (Don’t laugh — for many, BBM is an essential communications channel, and RIM is beginning to capitalize on this with its marketing.) Major apps like Evernote are still supporting and enhancing their Blackberry versions. Three of Consumer Reports‘ five recommended smartphones for “office-like tasks” are Blackberries.

For years, Blackberry has thrived in its niche market — the busy person on the go who needs 24/7 access to e-mail. But on so many fronts — especially app availability, usability and web browsing — Blackberry is falling behind, and I am afraid that I will have no choice but to switch camps.

Why? Two main reasons:

  • Critical Mass/Relevance. In my line of work, as much as my Blackberry helps me do my work, I feel like I need to be familiar with the industry standards. And while Blackberry was the pioneer and standard bearer of smartphones for so many years, it hasn’t done much lately to retain that title.
  • Innovation. For me, the apps are the kicker. I can’t help but be jealous when I see my friends playing with — er, professionally evaluating — cool apps like SCVNGR, and I can’t join in because there’s no Blackberry version. I don’t blame SCVNGR, really. They’re a business. They’re going to go where their customers are and where the functionality is advanced — and the Blackberry market has not been one of growth in either area.

RIM is banking a lot on OS version 6.0, which debuted with the recent release of the Blackberry Torch (reportedly with significant enhancements to the UI and browsing experience), but  it remains to be seen whether that will vault Blackberry back into relevance, or merely tide us RIM devotees over until the end of our contracts, when we might be tempted to jump ship.

I don’t want that day to come. I don’t want a fragile iPhone 4, and while Android phones are indeed drool-worthy, I’m on a family plan and might be locked into AT&T for the foreseeable future (plus, AT&T’s Android options predictably suck). But I don’t want to be left behind either.

I love my Blackberry. It’s been dependable and nigh invincible, given how brutally I treat it, and that hardiness has bred some severe loyalty. I’d like to see another smartphone survive being spiked into the sidewalk or drop-kicked across my office. Plus, I still love my keyboard.

Come on, RIM. If you’re really Research In Motion, let’s get moving in the right direction. There’s got to be a middle ground somewhere.

Photo by honou / Flickr Creative Commons

Good Fortune

Stephen Biernacki, a friend and fellow music aficionado from the higher ed Twitterverse, recently posted pics of the fortune cookie fortunes that, as he put it, “honest and motivated while working from home.”

As I read his post, my eye wandered to the half-dozen such fortunes I have tacked up on my computer monitor at work:

  • Be direct, usually one can accomplish more that way.
  • You are primed to come up with a creative solution.
  • Think of what you will think of 10 years from now.
  • Be not afraid of growing slowly, be afraid only of standing still.
  • Pay attention to your nonverbal cues, and try turning it down.
  • Today you should be the leader. Things will go your way.

Sure, it’s just words printed on a piece of paper slipped inside a mass-produced food product (I’ve seen it done in person!), but affirmation has come from stranger places. I like to surround myself with these little truths, when I find them, to remind me of both their inherent message as well as the fact that nuggets of inspiration are all around us.

Which fortune cookie words of wisdom stick with you, either literally (on your monitor) or in your mind?

Disclaimer: While I love a good fortune, I can’t stand the actual cookie. If we go out for Chinese food together, you’ll be in luck.

Zipcar Owns the Rewards Cycle

Some recent experiences and observations have helped me realize why Zipcar is such a successful brand. (Yes, I’ve posted about Zipcar before in this space, and I confess to being a bit of an evangelist for and frequent user of the service. So bear with me.)

Basically, they own the rewards cycle in every corner of their operation. For the sake of argument, let’s posit that every business inhabits four corners: virtual (online) space, actual (human) space, product space, and ethos space.

Virtual Space

Last week, Zipcar ran a haiku contest on Twitter. They piqued my poetry interest, so I dashed off this effort, which they retweeted:

Shortly thereafter, I received a direct message telling me they liked my haiku and were adding $25 worth of driving time to my Zipcar account. Score!

Everyone wins: Zipcar gets content; I get $25 in driving time.

Actual Space

This past Sunday, I attended the SoWa Open Market in Boston. Seeing the Zipcar tent (and perhaps still a little buzzed from my Haiku coup), I wandered over and told the guy manning the booth that I just wanted to share how much I liked Zipcar. He was happy to hear it and asked me if I wanted a water bottle. He went to a box behind the tent to retrieve one; it wasn’t one of the promotional goodies they had spread out on their table.

Everyone wins: Zipcar gets unsolicited, in-person praise from a customer; I get a water bottle (and a warm fuzzy).

Product Space

Zipcar’s product is a car sharing service, and much of its marketing revolves around its “refer-a-friend” deals.

We give you $50 in driving credit to play with, and you decide what to do. You can “give it all away”, “split it $25/$25″, or “keep it all for myself”. Driving credit is put into your (and your friend’s) Zipcar account as soon as your friend joins.

Everyone wins: Zipcar gets more customers; I get more driving time (and happy friends, perhaps)

Ethos Space

A company’s ethos is important. It’s not just about how they tweet, how they market or how good/bad their product is. The company’s character matters, too.

Zipcar’s involvement with the Pan-Mass Challenge (PMC) is a good example. The company, which is based in Cambridge, has been involved with this regional initiative for four years.  This year, they are fielding a 25-member team for the race (coming up this weekend Aug. 7-8) and hoping to raise $150,000 for the Jimmy Fund.

In addition, the company has four PMC-wrapped Kia Souls in its Boston fleet, available for a reduced rate of $8/hour (normal Kia Souls are $9.25/hour). On top of that, Zipcar donates $2 from every hour driven in a PMC-wrapped Kia Soul to the PMC.

Besides the PMC, Zipcar’s reduced rates for hybrid vehicles and other initiatives around “urban and environmental transformation” are mutually beneficial propositions.

Everyone wins: Zipcar gets points for having good character; I get the option of reserving cheaper cars (and feeling good about it).

What other companies or organizations similarly excel at owning the rewards cycle? Is there a fifth corner I’m neglecting to account for?

An Excellent Adventure at TED

When my friend Lis implored me to come to TEDxBoston, I demurred. Sure, I’d already requested the day off of work and TED talks are pretty great, but I’m busy with a ton of projects. Plus, did I really want to spend a summer day off inside a convention center listening to speeches?

Eventually, I caved. With some speaking gigs of my own coming up this fall, I figured it couldn’t hurt to do some homework.

Well. At TEDxBoston, I got a lot more than I bargained for.

The tagline for the event was “Revolutionary Ideas Start Here.” This plays off of both my city’s history and its present, as much hype is made of the “innovation economy” and Boston’s new Innovation District, to which TEDxBoston’s location was adjacent. And there is a lot of innovative stuff and revolutionary thinking going on in Boston. But it has little to do with the hype. The real innovation and revolutions that matter come from the empowerment of a single idea, of connecting someone’s vision to the resources and people that can help it grow. That was the recurring lesson I heard at TEDxBoston.

There were a lot of powerful moments and compelling insights at TEDxBoston. Some of my favorites:

  • Designer Eric Mongeon, author of 4 by Poe, talked about fear and the creative process. The root of fear, he explained, is uncertainty, and uncertainty is created when our picture of reality of upset by the experience of reality.
    • He cited The Vortex: a vicious cycle of research, rejection and refinement that helps us feel busy all the time, but doesn’t actually move us closer to our goal. Doing != making
    • Why do we allow ourselves to get caught in The Vortex? Because we are afraid to risk being wrong, so we end up “hiding in the homework.”
    • There are three ways we deal with fear: maintaining the picture, protecting the picture and ultimately modifying the picture.
    • Bringing a commercial element into the project can create accountability, and the involvement of others’ forces us to face our fear. It may not alleviate the anxiety, but it does make us move forward in spite of it.
  • Author and Harvard Business School Professor Clayton Christensen was supposed to speak, but he suffered a stroke very recently. Bravely, his daughter Ann took his place, choking back tears almost the entire time. She discussed deliberate versus emergent (or cumulative) strategies. A deliberate strategy is a set of guiding principles for both small and large life decisions. Does our emergent strategy — how all of our cumulative decisions add up — align with this, or get in the way of it? If we haven’t already, we should establish a deliberate strategy for our lives. Don’t wait to do the things that matter, Christensen said. “The future doesn’t get easier.” It’s up to us to take control of our own lives.
  • Bill Warner, founder of Avid and most recently the Anything Goes Accelerator Lab, spoke of the need to use your head, but to follow your heart.

Some of the other amazing ideas discussed at TEDxBoston:

  • Dave McLaughlin of Boston World Partnerships got us started by talking about how establishing horizontal relationships between vertical groupings can help build idea infrastructures. He drew the distinction between kittens and railroads. One is nice, and one is essential. Do we want a kitten infrastructure or a rail infrastructure. Ideas, thus, are essential.
  • Seth Priebatsch, CEO of geosocial gaming company SCVNGR, talked about how the past decade saw the development the social (connective) layer, while this new decade is seeing the beginning of development for the game (influential) layer. He shared four of the seven game dynamics that, combined with mindshare, are the building blocks for the construction of this new layer:
    • Appointment dynamic: performing at action at a predefined time (e.g. happy hour)
    • Influence and status (e.g. American Express black card, report card grades; he joked that if a valedictorian was instead called a “white knight paladin level 20,” people would work harder)
    • Progression dynamic (e.g. LinkedIn profile progress bar, SCVNGR)
    • Communal discovery: working together to achieve something (e.g. the old Digg model, McDonald’s Monopoly challenge)
  • John Harthorne of the MassChallenge startup competition had one of the best lines of the day: “Why Massachusetts? Because we’re awesome… When Massachusetts gets sad, we stop being sad and start being awesome again.”
  • In just ten minutes, Cesar Hidalgo of the MIT Media Lab almost got me to understand economic theory. He spoke in terms of Legos, putty and monkeys hopping from tree to tree to explain global economic development.
  • Muhan Zhang, a recent Boston Latin High graduate and musician who plays the erhu (a traditional Chinese string instrument), talked about blending the best ideas of our ancestors with our brand new ideas in order to innovate the past.
  • John Werner of Citizen Schools made the case for finding more ways to bring citizens into the schools and have everyone become an educator (like jury duty, but education duty), sharing their knowledge in order to enrich and inspire kids and show them where their ideas and talents can take them.
  • Bill Walczak of the Codman Square Health Center in Dorchester talked about the history of the organization and how it has redefined what success means for its organization over the years. The real disease to combat, he said, is poverty. Poverty is the root of teen pregnancy, drugs, violence, diabetes, and so much more.
  • Architect Sapir Ng discussed his vision for turning an abandoned, historic railway tunnel into an underground theater space that would connect various parts of the city, both vertically (above and below ground) and horizontally (the Theater District, the Boston Common and other areas around Tremont Street). The Boston Globe covered the project in April.
  • Scott Kirsner, a technology writer for The Boston Globe and author of Fans, Friends and Followers: Building an Audience and a Creative Career in the Digital Age, talked about the need to keep all the smart young people we recruit to New England for school in New England. Those smart young people, he said, are the great renewable resource in the region, and we have to do more for them. What can we do? Work harder to connect them to the innovation happening in the city and help them build their dreams right here.
  • Frank Reynolds, founder of InVivo Therapeutics, recovered from paralysis (in part by teaching himself neuroscience from his bed) and founded a company that is pioneering new therapies for people with spinal cord injuries.
  • Larry Lessig of Harvard Law School delivered a powerful presentation that drew the connection between the corruption of government with rampant influxes of campaign cash and the corruption of our kids’ bodies by childhood obesity.
  • By getting connected to a world outside their own, Vibha Pingel of Ubuntu at Work talked about how women living in poverty in India are gaining skills, running businesses and getting better opportunities for themselves and their children. She talked about two kinds of “small worlds” — the good kind, where we learn about mutual acquaintances we never knew we shared, and the bad kind, inhabited by these women in India where without initiatives like Ubuntu at Work they may never find a path to a better life.

At the end of the day, I felt several things:

  • Pride for my city and all of the amazing things happening in it
  • Enlightenment for gaining exposure to ideas and topics outside of my normal circuit of interests
  • Affirmation in the value of connecting and empowering people and their ideas

Revolutionary ideas may start here, as the tagline goes, but they require all of us to help bring them to fruition.

PR Lessons from “Mad Men”

The season premiere of the fourth season of “Mad Men” was aptly titled “Public Relations,” and it soon became clear why. Nearly a year into the existence of Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce, Don Draper and the rest of his “scrappy” (Pete’s word) firm are still finding their footing. In Don, that goes for more ways than one.

I followed the #madmen Twitter stream as I watched the episode, and saw the parallel #madmen #pr stream that emerged alongside it. Lots of my fellow communications geeks were drawing lessons and insights from the episode, and I’ve decided to collect some of mine here while they are fresh in my head. If you’re trying to avoid spoilers, save this post for later.

  • Even a one-legged reporter will beat you in a race if you let him. In this case, Don didn’t see the value of telling his story, and the resulting bad press puts a damper on the fledgling agency’s success. If you don’t define your brand, someone else is happy to do it for you — crooked leg or no.
  • In response to the bomb of an “Advertising Age” story, Draper gets hell from Roger Sterling and Bert Cooper. “Turning creative success into business is your work. And you failed,” admonishes Cooper. It’s not enough just to be brilliant, and your work won’t always speak for itself. You have to speak for yourself, too — and others may be depending on it.
  • Pete and Peggy embark on a hush-hush PR stunt to drum up more media buys by a client. Their tactic is a big risk that, while ultimately paying dividends, still draws the ire of Draper. The outcome of a big gamble may not always be black and white.
  • Don Draper shows off a seedier side of his image that surprised some fans of the show. His behavior, they said, was beneath him. Never assume you know someone too well. We all have secrets, and we all change. You can always be surprised.
  • In the show’s conclusion, Draper pitches Jantzen a campaign for their bikini two-piece bathing suit. When they react negatively, wanting something less suggestive, Draper loses it. He asks them if they know what kind of company they want to be — “conservative and dead, or risky and possibly rich.” Draper knows what kind of business he wants, and he is not going to suffer any fools standing in the way of that. He doesn’t want to waste his time. Even though the upstart firm may not be in a position to be choosy, Draper is willing to take this particular risk. Tellingly, in his next breath, he puts The Wall Street Journal interview into motion. Draper is seeing the value of shaping his story — and thus, his future.

Ultimately, this episode was about risk and consequence. What are the consequences of the choices made by Henry Francis for marrying Betty, by Pete and Peggy for secretly staging a PR stunt, by Don for blowing up at a client and underestimating the important of an Ad Age interview? For any PR, advertising, marketing or communications we do, that’s what we want to know — the consequence. And risk is a big variable when it comes to calculating consequence. The characters on “Mad Men” will be sure to explore that equation as this season progresses — and I’ll be watching.

The Social Media Campaign Your Social Media Campaign Could Smell Like

Everyone on the interwebz is collectively cracking up over the Old Spice videos on YouTube, wherein Old Spice Man (a/k/a Isaiah Mustafa) has posted dozens of video responses to tweets and comments from people ranging from ordinary joes like us to online celebrities such as Alyssa Milano.

So, what makes these videos so uniquely compelling?

  • They’re personal. The original Old Spice Man commercial that debuted during the Super Bowl was hilarious and got linked around a lot online. What they’ve done is taken the same formula but made it personalized. It’s engagement on content steroids. The most intriguing example of this is how someone asked Old Spice Man to post his marriage proposal (she accepted!). Tim Nekritz wrote the other day about how compelling personalized online communications can be, in the context of how the Atlanta Braves manage their Twitter account. Old Spice realizes that, and they are going all in with this campaign.
  • They’re well-written. Even though this is video content (and Isaiah Mustafa is, ahem, pleasant to look at), the key to the success of these videos, as Suzanne McDonald pointed out, is the writing. The copy needs to be concise (a script for a ~30 second video) and hilarious, not an easy order to fill. But the writers are doing a bang-up job. The tone of the script is no coincidence — it’s the smart, hyperbolic, absurdly hilarious type of writing that appeals to the youthful demographic they are aiming for. Appropriately, the distribution channels they are using for this campaign line up with the same demographic.
  • They’re produced in real-time. That’s the truly remarkable thing that’s happening here. Somewhere behind the shower curtain, the Old Spice communications team is doing the following, more or less in real-time:
  1. scanning hundreds of tweets and comments, gleaning a select few
  2. crafting sharp and humorous copy in response
  3. prepping the set, props and actor to film the response
  4. filming the response
  5. applying any post-production
  6. finally, posting the video online and tweeting about it
  7. Phew! Who knows how long they’ll keep it going, but it’s a lot of work — by my count, in one day, they created and posted about 117 videos! That’s a lot of rich content to churn out in something approximating real-time.

Even if yesterday was it, for one day’s worth of time for an actor, crew and writing staff, I think the reward was worth the effort, judging by the overwhelmingly positive response (and the wealth of content they now have floating around the web). What do you think?

EDIT: Outspoken Media makes some great comments on these points, as well.

Just Curious

As I may have mentioned before, my background is in journalism. Here’s a confession: I didn’t plan to go into journalism. Truth be told, I only “settled” for journalism because I thought a creative writing major wouldn’t be very lucrative. (Note to younger self: And you thought a journalism major would be??)

Anyhow, after I got over my fear of talking to strangers, I thrived as a journalist. Why? Because I am genuinely curious. I like learning. I want to know why people think what they think. I like talking to people and asking them questions.

Nowadays, most of my work could be classified as online marketing, much of which deals with social media. Again, it’s a pretty natural fit, and I believe it’s because the same basic principle applies. I’m genuinely curious. And curiosity is the crux of community building and brand development.

If you aren’t genuinely curious to learn who your audience is, what they’re looking for and what they’re talking about, you’re not going to find out. Curiosity is the human engine of web marketing. It’s what drives us to connect, to search, to click, to follow. It drives us to ask more, learn more, know more — to get to the bottom of whatever query consumes us.

If you are simply going through the motions because it’s what someone told you to do, but the thrust of basic curiosity is not there, you’re going to lose steam quick. (And if you’re not the least bit curious about your audience, then you should probably reconsider your day job.)

Being curious — being hungry for knowledge — is a lot of work. It puts you in the position of asking a lot of questions and doing a lot of research, which takes time and energy.

So what’s the reward for all of this work? Information, of course — the currency of the marketing world. And a good question is like a blank check. So ask, and ye shall receive.

‘Back to the Future’ Comes Back to the Now

Today, my density has brought me to you.

This little nugget was flying around the Twitterverse yesterday. Being a big “Back to the Future” fan, it caught my eye. It was tweeted by someone I trust. I retweeted without much thought.

My esteemed higher ed colleague Tim Nekritz, a self-described “social media canary,” pointed out that this claim was actually false. (In fact, Tim pounced on the same situation in February when rumors were going around Twitter that Gordon Lightfoot had died.) In the second movie, Marty and Doc travel to Oct. 21, 2015.

I was grateful to Tim for pointing out the error, and a little embarrassed. It was a good lesson, though.

As I learn more about the real-time web, my big concern has emerged as the need for context, accuracy and accountability. Information can get very slippery, very fast — as happened in this instance. Look at it go, at 88 miles per hour! Great Scott!

Trust is a major currency of the social web. We place our trust in our network to curate our content, feed us our information and signal to us the important or relevant issues in our areas of interest. When it comes to making sense of information in real-time, trust is a critical lens.

But trust isn’t everything. We can’t rely on blind faith alone. As Tim put it in his Gordon Lightfoot post, we need to be accountable for own publications, and a retweet is as much a publication as a blog post or a news article. You can’t believe everything you read, even if it comes from your trusted network. Trust must be balanced with common sense, and perhaps just enough skepticism to make you check something out before you believe it, much less rebroadcast it.

This is Heavy

Accuracy in real-time is not easy, and sometimes the stakes are higher than pop culture cred. This incident reminded me of back when I worked in an online newsroom — a true crucible of real-time information. Wire service news alerts are whizzing across the wires and new writethrus are piling up, each with new or changed details. Editors are yelling, radios and TVs are blaring. All the while, thousands of users are clicking and reading.

After Sept. 11, as the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq began to dominate the headlines, alerts would come across the wire and quickly be posted to the website. Soon enough, the story (e.g. about a missing plane) may be amended or corrected, but did we always post a retraction or correction to the previous alert? No. The story was still breaking, and we needed to go, go, go.

Was this right? Not ideally, no. For the person who read that alert at the moment we posted it, it was very real. That person trusted us. They won’t necessarily stick with us and hit refresh to see the more complete story begin to be told.

Was it avoidable? Hard to say. In our position, sitting in front of a computer in a newsroom, we’re trusting the wires. And the wires are trusting their sources and their own judgment. Revision and correction happens in real-time, but not every shade of it is acknowledged publicly. We are building towards a greater tapestry of context and accuracy to enshroud the story at hand, but we may miss a few stitches along the way. Does this sacrifice the integrity of the cloth in the end? Again, it’s hard to say. But it doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t aspire to an ideal of accuracy.

You Want a Pepsi, Pal, You’re Going to Pay For It

Of course, most of us don’t work in an online newsroom, meaning we have the luxury of time — and thus, the ability to hold ourselves (and others) accountable as real-time publishers.

So, the lesson learned? As this image I found on Buzzfeed attests…

However, there was one nugget of “Back to the Future” related trivia yesterday that was accurate. Actress Claudia Wells, who played Jennifer in the first movie of the trilogy, turned 44 on July 5. Happy birthday, Claudia!

Now, it’s time for me to make like a tree and get out of here.