Subscribe to RSS feed

Facebook, Trust and RoomSurf.com

Last night, The New York Times’ higher education blog “The Choice” posted about the latest Facebook antics perpetrated by RoomSurf.com (update: here is the coverage from today’s newspaper), a purported roommate matching service that has gotten flak before for creating Facebook groups for prospective students of specific schools (more than 150, to be exact). The groups do not appear to be affiliated with a commercial service, using imagery and language that makes them appear — on the surface — to be an official school creation.

A devoted cadre of higher ed web professionals has been working hard behind the scenes to expose these groups as fraudulent. But why? Why so much effort for a couple of Facebook groups? It’s the web – people will talk about what they want, where they want, right? Who cares if it’s on our official groups or some random group?

Here’s why it matters.

Any brand – whether it’s a university or a chocolatier or a hair salon – has assets. Name, wordmark, logo, mascot, tagline — you name it. On the web, these assets are readily available. You may try to protect access to hi-res versions or what have you, but in truth, the assets to create a reasonable facsimile of your brand are floating around the web, and in all likelihood, you put them there.

In most cases, people have no interest in trying to deceive an audience to believe they are affiliated with a particular organization; they just say their piece. People create groups and pages and accounts and blogs about different aspects of our brands and reference our names and maybe even our imagery, but they also make obvious their affiliations, agendas and ownership. The dilemma that cropped up with RoomSurf is the exception to the rule.

So why is it concerning that a prospective student might join this inauthentic Facebook group? Because initiating a relationship is a tentative display of trust. If someone is joining a specific group, they are seeking community and information, which flow most freely in a trusting (and trusted) environment. If what the students end up with is a lack of value and a sales pitch, who do they blame? Not RoomSurf — us. They will lose trust in the institution with which they associate those brand assets. We will have let them down, and we won’t even know it. So even though we’ve created and cultivated our welcoming spaces for community and information, those students may never make it there, due to some profit-motivated misdirection.

But it’s not about protecting our brand. It’s about protecting the trust. Our brand assets are out there; we know it, and there’s not a lot that can be done about it. The priority is to make sure that those assets aren’t misrepresented to prospective students, thus steering them away from the resources that are available to them. It’s about doing our best to make sure that the trust is kept and maintained over time and that the relationships that are initiated are valuable and fruitful.

What the RoomSurfs of the world do is dilute the brand, but they also dilute the trust. Our community deserves the value it seeks. In addition to efforts such as the one that led to the NY Times coverage, it is imperative that we continue making the communities we create — online or otherwise — places of real value that serve our audiences’ needs. That’s the best offense you can field in a matchup like this.

Related coverage:

The Real Social Network

Tonight, I saw “The Social Network.” It was an engrossing story about friendship, betrayal and ambition, with cameos by wget and emacs. I highly recommend the film.

But this blog post is not about the film.

Before the movie started, I overheard three women, about 22-23 years old, sitting behind me, reminiscing about social networks of days gone by. I tweeted a couple of the choice bits:

OH before “The Social Network” – Girl 1: Who came up with Myspace? Girl 2: Tom.

OH (same girls) re: Twitter: “I don’t feel the need to follow somebody.” They also couldn’t recall Friendster’s name and called it Flickr.

Hardy har, right? Well, just before the lights went down for the previews, a woman sitting in front of me gestured to me, showed her phone and said, smiling, “Is this you?” There on the screen, I saw one of those tweets.

“Yup, that’s me,” I responded. We exchanged smiles and a laugh, mine tinged with a bit of shock, as the theater grew dark. I can’t say I’ve ever been approached with my own tweet in near real-time before, by a presumed stranger. I wasn’t quite creeped out, but I was very curious.

I also thought it quite apt that this bizarre exchange took place right before seeing “The Social Network.” I resolved to introduce myself once the movie ended and clarify how she made the connection between the tweet and the person sitting behind her.

Once the credits began to roll, I leaned over and asked, “So, how did you know it was me?” She said she had looked at the nearby tweets, as I suspected, tilting her head knowingly in the direction of the girls I had quoted. Then she referenced me by my employer, and, surprised, I said, “Yes, I work there, how did you know?” Turns out, I was talking to @camberville, someone I’ve followed on Twitter for a while, and whose blog I had just commented on earlier today.

Dumbfounded, I shook her hand. Mark Zuckerberg’s social graph had revealed itself in the dim light of a movie theater. So, yeah, I may have seen “The Social Network” tonight. But I also lived it.

Foursquare 2.0: They’re Here to Play Ball

Earlier this evening, after seeing tweets about the release of Foursquare 2.0, I upgraded the app on my iPad, read the company blog post explaining the new features, and tweeted: “With 2.0, @foursquare stakes a solid claim in becoming the default framework for your social life.”

Then, a bunch of people from Foursquare’s marketing and product teams retweeted me :-)

Sound bytes are nice, but I’m a big believer in context. So here’s the context behind that tweet:

  • With the new emphasis on Tips and To-Dos, with several UI modifications making these features more prominent, it is obvious that Foursquare wants to become your new default social recommendation engine. Foursquare wants your friends, as well as the strangers with whom you overlap social trajectories, to drive the things you do and the places you visit. Of course, the more powerful the network, the more viable is Foursquare’s profit model.
  • With the bump up that To-Do lists get in this version, I think there’s a lot Foursquare could do with To-Do lists as content. For instance, I keep a list via Google Tasks of restaurants I want to try. I will now probably copy that onto Foursquare. Will Foursquare find cool ways of highlighting To-Do list content? Can users gain badges for creating awesome to-do lists that others follow (e.g. cupcake tour of Boston, most interesting memorials in the city)? Can Foursquare To-Do lists rival SCVNGR challenges? This all seems especially relevant in light of last week’s Foursquare Universities announcement.
  • With the Add to My Foursquare functionality, Foursquare jumps off of your phone and joins the social media big leagues with web integration. It bridges the gap between the way we learn about things and the way we do things, which is huge. And making it easy for businesses and organizations to embed venues (and tips) on their own sites is also a win-win.

What does Foursquare 2.0 mean in the wake of Facebook Places? (You remember, Facebook Places, that thing with all the hoopla that I rarely see in my news feed and heretofore presents no added value?) Well, first of all, note how despite sharing a stage at the announcement of Places, Foursquare 2.0 has no (apparent) Facebook Places integration or doo-dads. Hmmm…

Honestly, I have no idea what Facebook aims to do with Places. I had thought a while ago that they were going to integrated any eventual geolocation features into their community pages, and while there are hints of a compatible groundwork, nothing is confirmed as of yet. All I can say is, I think Foursquare has taken a huge leap forward with 2.0, so if Facebook has big plans in store for Places, they best start rolling them out.

Somerville Local First: Hyper Local and Hyper Social

I am about to sign the lease and begin my eighth year of living in Somerville. I initially came here to live near friends, and while that’s still a draw, I’ve also become enamored with the community spirit and entrepreneurial culture that pervades the city.  A lot of that is shown through the vibrant arts scene, but local businesses are also strong and well organized here in Somerville, and a lot of that is due to Somerville Local First.

Somerville Local First launched in May 2008 with the goal of promoting local and sustainable economic development. The organization comprises 180 members, 140 of which are locally owned, independent businesses.

Over the course of this year, I’ve become more familiar with Somerville Local First, in part through their print publications and partnerships with local businesses, but also through their presence on the web. Their Twitter and Facebook presences are engaging and informative, keeping me in the loop about what businesses are up to around town and who is new to the area, and their blog – which launched along with their redesigned website last month – has quickly become a compelling and enlightening read. The blog brings together voices from the likes of dog owners, interns, policy researchers and local business owners on topics ranging from a review of a recent garden tour to the phenomenon of “local-washing.”

I spoke with Joe Grafton, the founding executive director of the nonprofit, about the approach that the small organization (Grafton is the only paid employee) has taken to communicating via the web and social media. Acknowledging that the organization can’t do everything or be everywhere at once, Grafton decided to focus Somerville Local First’s online presence on being an aggregator of content from around—and even outside—the city, all emphasizing local, sustainable economic development.

Beside their blog and social media accounts, Somerville Local First has also experimented with group buying (through the pilot Shift and Save coupon program) and plans to eventually devote a section of their website for people to access location-based specials in real-time via their mobile phones.

For Grafton, communicating via the web and social media is all about telling a story and having conversations, and using those engagements to advance the mission of Somerville Local First and support its members.

“I do feel that these channels are valuable and can create change in our community, which is why we choose to invest in them.”

The mission of SLF is to support local and sustainable economic development. How do you see social media supporting that mission?

I was at our national conference in Charleston this year—we’re affiliated with BALLE (Business Alliance for Local Living Economics)—and a colleague and friend from Local First Arizona talked about how she spends three to four nights a week at community meetings talking about Local First Arizona, where we as an organization just don’t have the resources to do that right now. Because we just don’t have the manpower to really manage our program and run the network in addition to doing outward community outreach and storytelling, we look at the web as our way to tell the story 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Lots of Somerville businesses and organizations are using Twitter. How do you, as an umbrella organization of sorts, seek to complement that and promote that?

In the world of new media and especially Twitter, we look at ourselves as content aggregators. There are a number of businesses that are part of our network using different channels – Facebook, Twitter, what have you – and we are the funnel all of it feeds into. What we try to do is provide a steady stream of information from our members to the people who follow us in that mechanism.

We also do different things on Twitter. We use it as a way to convey a message. It’s not just about promotion. Primarily we’re an educational organization. When we promote a business, we’re promoting it because we believe that if people are patronizing that business, the economy is doing better than if they weren’t. We share articles and knowledge with the community so that it’s not just about this promotion from business XYZ, but here’s what happens when you move you money to a local financial institution, or think about where your food comes from. By providing a rich diversified stream of content, what we hope people are following us on Twitter will do is have the ability to really see what’s happening in Somerville. As we think about new media, in a way we’re filling the role of some old media a — letting people know what’s happening in the community, but with a slant around local and sustainable.

Since launching, your blog has showcased a number of voices from across the community, covering a diverse range of topics. How did you go about planning for this blog and shaping its focus and content?

It started with us with really developing an understanding with HubSpot, which is one of the leaders in the country around inbound marketing. We did some education on our own and at that point we’d been using social media to push messages, but we thought, ‘What do we want people to do when they come to our site?’ We had a site which was good enough for a startup but not good enough. We were going to launch a new website anyways.

Our board members, who are running businesses or nonprofit organizations, can’t spend a huge amount of time developing the content. We’re big, big fans of watching what other people are doing, watching what works and copying it. You could look at the types of content and breadth of contributors and see the exact same plan as the Huffington Post. They have a huge number of people who are contributors. Every time someone gets something published there, they share it in their circle and drive traffic to the Huffington Post website and get the message out there. We thought that was a good model to follow.

We have four distinct categories of contributors – staff, board members and interns from Somerville Local First; Somerville Local First members, nonprofits, businesses, what have you; community bloggers and reporters — those are just writers who are interested in local and contribute to our blog from a number of angles; and third-party experts, people who may not necessary be in Somerville but have a very important role to play in the local movement around the country. As an organization that is really trying to be a leader in telling the story through the web, we thought having all these different communities contributing would add to vibrancy and make it more interesting for people to come back and see the content. But it all came out of, we don’t have enough time and resources to make this work, so let’s see what does work and emulate it.

“Local” as a theme is getting a lot of buzz today. How does the web, from your experience, help support the idea of local?

I think it’s so critical. There are a couple of reasons why its important. One of the main reasons is, we’re actually doing such a good job at changing the taste and the values of the customer base in the country that lots of non-local organizations are starting to adopt the wording and messaging around local.

What the web allows us to do is deliver a message that doesn’t have to come through a filter outside of our control. We’re not pitching a news story or article or TV segment that will be processed and delivered through the lens of producers or writers. We’re able to tell the story in a more authentic way and without compromise. I think that one piece is really having authenticity of the message.

Also, I think that maybe I’m an early adopter on this but I think so many people get their news through social media now as opposed to traditional channels, so it allows us to create things that are viral. Every time someone who is contributing to our blog or knows someone whose contributing to our blog sees something go online, that’s an opportunity where they might share that with their network. That may get people in their circle thinking about local and why it’s important and thinking about sustainability. The viral nature of news delivery on social media and the web allows for our message to multiply.

That’s where the real opportunity in social media and the web for us is getting that message virally shared and get closer to a point where the majority of people in our community care about local and there’s demand for entrepreneurs to come in and sell.

The Shift and Save coupons work like a hyperlocal Groupon. How did that idea come about and how successful was it?

Just looking at trends and what’s working in the market. [We asked,] how can we generate revenue for the network but provide a tangible benefit for business members through the website? How can we as an organization use our followers to support our message and support our members and support the organization?

We sold 100 coupons in just over a day, which was a total capacity of what we had to sell. That exceeded our expectation. We’re tracking the data to see whether or not this is actually going to be good for the businesses. I’m actually pretty unsure whether these group buying things are good for the businesses. We’re tracking things like, of people who bought coupons for Sherman Market, how many are new customers? When they bought with the coupon, what was the total order value? In time, we’ll have data to say how much it actually was good for the business. We’re dedicated to the fact that, after our testing, regardless of how much revenue or how quickly we sell, if it turns out the program doesn’t really benefit the businesses, we’re just not going to do it. Ultimately, we’re here to support local entrepreneurs and if group buying doesn’t do it, even on a hyper local basis, then we’re not going to do it.

What’s next for Somerville Local First on the web and in social media?

I do think that we are always striving to have conversations in all of these channels. We’re not just about broadcasting. People are really good at tuning out broadcasting and that’s not what we want to be. We like to ask questions and generate dialogue and have discussion.

We’re starting to get to the saturation point in our web channels with early adopters. We’ve got the early adopters invested in what we’re doing and contributing. As we start going outside of the circle, and group buying is one way we might do that. You’re reaching people not so into local but who are into saving money, and it generates more discussion and points of view.

I keep a strong eye on how we do with interactions and whether people are responding to what we’re posting about. When I look at other pages, I think we do really well but I know there’s a lot we can do. For the next six months, we’ll let what we’ve got roll and continue to try to improve it and keep our eye on trends, looking at location based services and see where the markets are going and do what we’ve done in the past which is look at what other people are doing that’s working and see if we can do that ourselves.

The Secret to Eternal Life, and the Myth of “Old” and “New” Media

First, credit where credit is due. This post is in part inspired by this tweet from allen & gerritsen:

It’s a shame the word “synergy” was abused by the corporate world, because when it actually happens, it’s pretty special.

Two instances of synergy over the weekend stood out to me, and I wanted to openly ruminate a bit about what they mean:

  • Betty White on SNL: We all know what happened. In a span of just over four months, one guy’s wish to see Betty White host Saturday Night Live became reality, thanks for a movement he fostered via Facebook. White is enjoying a resurgence in popular culture (much deserved, I believe), and people seemed to think it was a crime she hadn’t hosted the show already. By all accounts, the resulting episode was a hysterical hit.
  • 48 Hour Magazine: If I hadn’t been out of town this past weekend, I would have been all over this. Writers, editors, designers and photographers from around the world came together (virtually) to create a themed magazine from soup to nuts over a 48-hour period. The magazine will be printed and sold via a magazine-centric print-on-demand service. The original idea for the project only came about two weeks ago.

Okay. So. What do these events have in common?

  • Quick to Market: Both went from idea to reality in a relatively short time frame
  • People Power: Both were initiated by random individuals and sustained by collective investment
  • Cross-Pollination: Both blossomed at the intersection of old and new media
  • Failing Forward: Both advanced despite the odds; no one stopped to say no or be held back by precedent (they just happened to fail to, well, fail)

It’s very common, even in vogue, to complain about how SNL is way past its prime, and print media are dead in the water. But in the span of one weekend, both of those tropes were disproven. SNL pulled in higher ratings than they have in nearly two years (since Tina Fey’s depiction of Sarah Palin), and the 48 Hour Magazine drew three times more submissions than its editors anticipated (we’ll have to see how the sales go once it’s printed). Behold the power of the internet to motivate and organize the dispersed masses! [insert lightning bolt here]

What’s the lesson learned? The lesson is that nothing is dead; it’s just waiting to evolve. The capacity to do great things and defy convention can reveal itself, given the right blend of inspiration and motivation.

When we’re talking about the relationship between print and web, or web and broadcast, or even print and broadcast — whatever the media in questions are — let’s not settle for mere alignment. Let’s try to shake up the model, because that’s the only way the model is going to progress. Turn the model on its side and look at it in a new way. Who’da thunk you could publish a print magazine in something relatively approximating real-time? Well, you can. Put that in your pipe and download it.

Forget the word synergy. Too vocab-y, too loaded. It really just boils down to open-mindedness. It’s about realizing that the old and the new are not diametrically opposed to one another; they are mutually informative. In fact, there is no old and new; there is only evolution and continuity. As the folks at allen & gerritsen might say, “What’s next?”

Here Come Facebook Community Pages

I wish I knew exactly what Facebook was trying to do nowadays, but I take comfort in the fact that few people seem to. Last week, they officially began rolling out the next evolution of Pages. Yes, we know all about the like vs. fan language changes (I blogged about them earlier this month), but there’s more.

One new feature is the community page, which Facebook describes as “a new type of Facebook Page dedicated to a topic or experience that is owned collectively by the community connected to it.” Currently, users can “like” them, read them and sign up to help do *something* to them at some undetermined point in the future. Right now, it’s more or less a dump of Wikipedia content and (somewhat usefully) a handful of search results for mentions of the topic in question from other people’s status updates.

The other day, on Twitter, Lane commented about the community page for her university. “Oh man,” I thought, as I navigated to the page for mine. While lots of organizations are there, it appears not everything A few questions right off the bat:

  • In using search to find the above community page links, both the official fan page and the community page come up. In the case of Lane’s school, the two are nearly indistinguishable in the fill-in search results. The only difference is that one is branded as “Organization” and the other as “University.” Guess which is which? It’s not what you would think. If you’re a prospective student, which one will you click on?
  • Given the above, will Community Pages inadvertently divert conversation away from the brand-managed Page? Right now, community pages are not very interactive or engaging, but depending on how they evolve, is this a possibility?
  • Some of the content on these new pages that I actually find really valuable is the search results. Will Facebook take it one step further and provide an RSS feed of public search strings for easy monitoring, a la Twitter? Or would that make it too easy on the brand manager? Do we have to digest everything via Facebook’s airtight sausage casing?
  • We can’t control the branding used on these pages, which is obvious. But, if they’re using an old wordmark or seal or photo, how could we suggest a change or simply  inform someone that a change is needed? It’s unclear.
  • When Community Pages come out of beta, how exactly people will be able to “help” down the line (as the text above those pages currently promises)? I like to joke that Wikipedia is managed by the trolls under the bridge, with whom you can barter favors in exchange for buckets of fish heads. While Facebook itself runs a tight ship, it tends to be very open in what it lets users do in community spaces, so one would presume the Community Page would be like a Wikipedia entry, with a somewhat more accessible editorial process.
  • For brand managers, it means one more playground to monitor. Will it function the same as Wikipedia, where third-party authorities rule the day, and primary sources are discouraged from shaping the content? If so, will a hierarchy of editors and information managers emerge?
  • What I haven’t seen as many people hopping up and down about is how Facebook is using these community pages to give our personal profiles more legs. Now, when I type “running” as an interest, I will have the option to connect my profile to a Community Page about running. I don’t think, of all the profiles I’ve read on Facebook, that I’ve ever clicked on someone’s interest. Will I now?
  • Lastly, more of a wishlist note than anything: if we’re going to be tying information elements together, can we finally get the ability to share content via pages? If you work at a university like me, chances are you have multiple campus departments or organizations with Facebook fan pages of their own. Much as I can re-share content posted by friends on my news feed, I want to do the same with content posted on other pages, via a page that I manage.
  • Robinteractive has a really, really good overview of the Community Page issue, which covers these topics and then some. As mentioned in the post, we don’t know the whole story yet of what this will all mean; all we can do is monitor and be prepared. Some other good commentary:

  • Read Write Web likens this coming tide of links to another content mill, and reminds us not to connect ourselves to any unsavory community pages, since all of this information is public.
  • CNet touches on the content mill point as well, wondering whether this new trove of content will become “a sort of user-generated content purgatory” or a valuable, searchable resource. With this, Facebook seems to be challenging Google, which espouses a corporate commitment to organizing information. With all of the information looping and weaving going on with these changes, Facebook seems bent on commoditizing information for all it’s worth.
  • Fast Company explains in greater depth about what the introduction of Community Pages means for people’s management of their personal profiles, as well as calling out the potential implication of Community Pages in more location-based, interest-driven functionality down the road.
  • Update: Michael Fienen over on DotEduGuru has a really good analysis of what this means for brands.