Subscribe to RSS feed

Content Strategy and Location-Based Marketing

Tuesday night, the inimitable SchneiderMike, senior VP of the digital incubator at Allen & Gerritsen, held court at Meadhall for a meeting of Content Strategy New England, talking location-based marketing as it relates to content strategy. He literally co-wrote the book on location-based marketing, and his passion for the topic is infectious.

Despite the noise and the distraction of about a thousand beers on draft, Mike dropped a ton of valuable insights, some of which I have captured below:

  • The biggest opportunities for content strategy beyond the checkin come from the semantic web. How can LBS leverage data — history, tips, friends, etc. — to enhance context and create more informed user experiences?
  • People expect an experience around a place. What are the content types within an experience? Is place a content type? A place has structure — how do we define that?
  • A huge challenge for content strategy around location is fragmentation. A place can exist in multiple databases. As much as possible, we need to own the standardization of our venue data across all platforms and enable our content to be served across all of them.
  • Food for thought: there’s no W3C standard for location. Relatedly, we need to expand our editorial style to account for location.
  • We need to start thinking of the web as a giant database.
  • Context, context, context!
  • Some services of note:
    • Ditto – An app that addresses your intent, most relevant at or before the decision point for what you want to do, semantically leveraging structured content and metadata to make recommendations.
    • Forecast – Another app centered around intent, sharing your upcoming plans with friends.
    • Über – Request a car direct to your location
    • Where
  • “Media organizations have a shit ton of content,” and they’re adapting it for LBS.
  • Apps should be smarter by looking at checkin history, friends, etc to make recommendations. Draw conclusions. Leverage rating data against location to make real time recommendations.
  • Can content enter the Uncanny Valley and be too participatory? There are good and bad uses. Be relevant and useful. Don’t overreach beyond reason.
  • “We’re all layered.” As content strategists, we need to understand these layers and how individuals want to use those layers. What channels make sense for which content/engagement? Use the right channel.
    • We need to wrangle these data streams in a social CRM.
  • Re: daily deals, these will continue. But we need to make deals feel like content
    • We need to push smarter, more relevant deals — things we know they want. Groupon is a Ponzi scheme. Apps like Level Up type stuff will grow, integrate into point of sale system.
  • Foursquare does not look at itself as a media channel, and it needs to. Brands need to know impressions and “dones” (for tips). That’s how we’ll get to effectiveness. How effective is History Channel? Who knows?
  • Checking in to TV shows is gaining in popularity, as a means to find others who share your passion.
    • There is multiple screen convergence happening while watching television.
    • Hashtags add context and community to the viewing experience.
  • Checkins are an unnatural behavior; there must be a great motivation to do so.

A lot of food for thought. Thanks, SchneiderMike! Want more? Check out this cheat sheet excerpted from “Location-Based Marketing for Dummies,” including the five rules of location-based marketing.

WTF FTW Part 2: The Real Internet

The other day, I wrote about Why The Fuck Should I Choose Oberlin? (WTFSICO), an irreverent but successful effort by a couple of loyal Obies to showcase why they love their school.

We talk a lot about authenticity in higher ed web marketing, but how much more authentic can you get than a website powered by user submissions, showcasing what people really like about an institution via an internet trope they readily embrace? (It’s important to note that, while I call it a “marketing” site, it is an unofficial site not officially endorsed by the university. More than anything, it’s a fan site that just happens to be run by university staff and alums.)

When I see WTFSICO, I see a reflection of any number of popular single-serving sites that come down the pike, go viral (like, legitimately viral) and spark a huge amount of sharing, conversation and attention. In short, what I see is the real internet. I don’t see a time-delayed facsimile that has been vetted by committees and upheld by established best practices, and in the process had all the life, authenticity and relevance wrung right out of it. I see a real-time cultural echo.

In higher ed, we far too often call that a risk.

Look Beyond .edu

At HighEdWeb, I talked about how higher ed needs to begin using mainstream media as an analog for developing our own news sites — learning from the standards they are setting for an online news experience and from the platforms, channels and content types they are embracing to tell stories.

But the validity of that approach goes beyond news. In his HighEdWeb session, University of Florida’s Jeff Stevens brought up everything from Kiva to Kickstarter to Farmville as inspirations for engaging alumni and soliciting donations in ways that are new to higher ed but proven in other contexts. If we’re reaching out to a particular audience via the internet, why not do what works for that audience? Seems simple enough to me. Maybe it’s a magazine. Maybe it’s LOLcats. If it works, it works.

The fact of the matter is, if you are doing what you’ve always done, or sticking only to proven .edu conventions, you will soon find yourself falling behind — or realizing you’ve been behind for a while. That’s not to say we should change on a whim, or just for the sake of changing. Not at all. But we can’t be complacent. That would be the real risk.

Fun, Fun, Fun, Fun

At Ithaca College, where campus closes at 3 p.m. in the summer, multimedia content coordinator Rob Engelsman and his colleagues took the opportunity to do a “fun, summery thing… to help celebrate the weekend” and post humorous GIFs to the university Twitter account. Yes, GIFs. In case you didn’t know, this 24-year old file format is having a cultural resurgence via sites like Reddit and a host of Tumblrs. Two of the most popular ones for IC were Rebecca Black visiting the campus fountains, which drew about 518 clicks, and a rendering of what campus looks like at 3:01PM on Fridays, which got about 189 clicks.

“For the last shuttle launch, we photoshopped the space shuttle lifting off from our new Athletics Center which has a large tower on it, and for the fourth of July we had the liberty bell swinging between our two iconic towers on campus with fireworks in the background,” says Engelsman. They got some feedback about a couple of the GIFs being too goofy, but according to Engelsman, “we had fun anyway.”

Recently, I saw Mike Richwalsky of John Carroll University tweet, “So we run digital signage, and I’m so tempted to put “STUDENTS Y U NO GET FLU SHOTS” on there promoting our free flu shots. #jobsecurity.” Pittsburg State’s Michael Fienen responded by creating the slide, which Richwalsky then adapted for use in digital signage. I’m not sure if he actually published it or not, but I thought it was hilarious — and certainly attention-getting, which is what you want for a flu shot campaign.

These examples few and far between. Though Rob Engelsman tipped me off to at least one company in the higher ed space is embracing this — check out Unigo’s Find Me a Fucking College single-serving site, driving users to the Unigo pages for various schools.

Too School For Cool

There is one giant caveat: It is extraordinarily difficult for us to do this. One of my cardinal rules is “don’t try to be cool,” because if we try to hard to be cool, we will only look foolish. This is tricky stuff to pull off. Photocopying pop culture is not a recipe for success; it’s a shortcut to failure.

We also wrestle with our own gravitas. I think many institutions would want to characterize themselves as forward-thinking and not hidebound, but how much of our marketing is hidebound? When trying to be forward-thinking, how often are we forced to tie one arm behind our back? Why do we have to hashtag neat, valid ideas #jobsecurity? Where does the real risk lie?

Why WTFSICO works for its creators is that they are not too far removed from their target demographic. Also, the site is not official, and it likely didn’t languish for months between conception and launch. WTFSICO is a natural extension of their love and enthusiasm for Oberlin and a natural expression of what, to them, is an effective web presence. In short, they are not trying too hard.

The July 2010 Brigham Young University parody of the Old Spice guy videos worked because it was a real-time, nearly instantaneous reaction to a pop culture phenomenon. (The incredibly popular video response phase of “The Man Your Man Could Smell Like” campaign launched July 14, 2010; the BYU video went up the next day. The original commercial had debuted in February 2010.)

Still, we have to be attentive to internet cultural phenomena like LOLcats and GIFs and single-serving websites. They represent a key dialect of the language that the rest of the internet is speaking, and we do not operate on a separate internet. In marketing, achieving a fluency in that language is the biggest challenge. Whether we’re talking Tumblr or flyers, the language may change but the challenge remains the same.

But maybe efforts like WTFSICO are out of our reach. Maybe they only succeed because they are not institutionally grown. Maybe we’re too close to the problem to be part of the solution, and our role is best served encouraging from afar rather than creating on our own. Maybe. Maybe not.

It’s easy for us to segregate ourselves, but our users don’t. We’re judged alongside everything else. We don’t get a break. Believe it or not, we are on the actual, real internet, right alongside everybody else. So need to find ways to start acting like it.

What do you think?

A Dash of WTF FTW

The other day, I came across an unexpected link in my Twitter stream. Ma’ayan Plaut, social media coordinator at Oberlin College and a 2010 Oberlin grad, shared the link to Why The Fuck Should I Choose Oberlin, a website she launched on Oct. 26 with Harris Lapiroff, a UX developer at Oberlin and a 2011 graduate. (Lapiroff also runs a Tumblr called Fuck Yeah Oberlin, playing off a popular Trumblr trope.)

This single-serving website offers a variety of reasons why you should, well, fucking choose Oberlin, and it is powered by user submissions (though is it moderated for repeats, irrelevance, typo correction and to exclude mentions of current students or add relevant URLs). Some of my favorites include:

  • “Because where else can you have friends who are fucking harpsichordists and physicists and fucking activists and shit?”
  • “Because the president of the college once danced with Yoko Ono. On the fucking Finney Chapel stage. In front of hundreds of students.”
  • “Because squirrels will rule the world and the albino one is their leader.”
  • “Because we appreciate art and shit.”
  • “Because our neuroscience department is actually baller as shit.” (This one is my super-favorite.)

I was surprised (and impressed) by how smart, bold and different this site was, and I wanted to learn more. So I asked Plaut and Lapiroff to answer some fucking questions. Here are their fucking answers.

GC: How did you get the idea for whythefuckshouldichooseoberlin.com?

MP: The simple answer is that we both really fucking love Oberlin, and we both have since before we got here as students. For me, I’ve spent way too much time clicking through What the Fuck Should I Make for Dinner, and I started following the Fucking Word of the Day on Twitter over a year ago (and my vocabulary has gotten much better, as a result).

I’ve spent much time being official eyes and ears and words of Oberlin, and sharing about Oberlin comes naturally to me. I guess this website was just waiting to happen.

HL: Ma’ayan pretty much covered it, but yeah, I’m pretty much always on the lookout for websites I can make that are simple and fun. We both love Oberlin and we both love the internet, so we spend an unsurprisingly large amount of time brainstorming Oberlin-related things we can do on the internet and sometimes we do them!

GC: How are you guys getting away with this? You’re both Oberlin alums, but you’re also employed by the college. Is this officially sanctioned? If not, do you risk getting in trouble?

MP: After graduating from Oberlin in 2010, I began a one year position as the web fellow in the office of communications at Oberlin College, which transitioned into a full-time position as Social Media Coordinator. I spend much of my time (both at work and not at work) thinking about social media, what works, what doesn’t, observing our audiences and monitoring conversations, good and bad, about Oberlin. The underlying goal of this site was to share our love for Oberlin with other Obies and hopeful Obies, because we were once one group and we are now in the other. Not much has changed, except that we’ve gotten more enthusiastic over time. We’re not alone in our enthusiasm.

This is not an officially sanctioned website, nor are we posting this to any official websites. This site was made entirely on our own time and using skills we also implement while working for the school in our respective positions. We have a tacit and unofficial approval from our boss (VP of Communications and an alum of Oberlin himself).

HL: Like Ma’ayan said, this is definitely not official. I understand that things that people do and say in their free time has been known to get them in workplace trouble. One of the things I really love about working at Oberlin is that it’s a pretty open-minded institution. There’s no constant threat of draconian punishment for stepping out of line that you might find at more uptight organizations. Overall, however, response from individuals within the staff has been (unofficially) positive. People seem to get it.

GC: What are the stats, as of the time of this response, for the site? (Hits, shares, tweets, reblogs, etc.)

MP: As of the first 24 hours, we have had 1423 submissions and 2036 shares on Facebook. Our analytics show that we had 7,889 unique visitors and and 258,356 page views in that span of time, too. From a preliminary glance at Tumblr and Twitter we’ve probably had close to 100 shares to those sites as well.

As of Saturday afternoon (Oct. 29), we’ve have over 2000 submissions and 2684 shares on Facebook. We’ve had 10,214 unique visitors and an accumulated 400,697 page views.

GC: Who is visiting this site? How are people discovering it? Are you linking to it from official web/social channels?

MP: A vast majority of our publicity has occurred as a result of Facebook sharing of the original website link, and to a lesser extent, friends posting screenshots and links on Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr (these are harder to track as they leave our site, since we can’t track private Twitter accounts or untagged posts on Tumblr).

GC: What has the reaction been from students (prospective and current), the admissions office and the administration?

MP: Within the first few hours of our first posting, we had class trustees, admissions counselors and interns, and a handful of administrators from around the school liking and sharing the links on Facebook. We spent much of Thursday fielding emails, Facebook tags, text messages, phone calls, and personal interactions that went something like this:

Them: “Great fucking website guys!”
Us: “THANK YOU. Submit things to us!”
Them: “Okay!” (or in many cases, “We already did!”)

We tried extremely hard to push via word of mouth, both in person and online (note: Oberlin is currently in fall recess, which means there are few students).

We’re not sure what the prospective student response is at this point, but we have had a surprising amount of responses from non-Obies who said that they wish they had chosen Oberlin instead of their school.

We’ve had really great responses from alums, though, who’ve said they’ve never been as proud of their alma mater as they are now, or that they never repost things that curse but they make an exception for something like this… and they’re demonstrating it by sharing their reasons that they love Oberlin with us and by sharing the link (or their favorite reasons) with the world.

HL: People who already love Oberlin fucking love this website. I’m curious to see if we’ll get any reaction from prospies, high school college counselors, &c. We haven’t heard much yet.

GC: Single-serving sites are a fairly common phenomenon (for example, barackobamaisyournewbicycle.com, khaaan.com, ytmnd.com, sadtrombone.com), as are user submission-driven Tumblrs, but I can’t say I’ve ever seen them employed this way in a higher ed marketing context. Do you think we in higher ed should take more cues from memes and other niche, viral, pop culture content?

MP: I think, in trying to approach a variety of generations, you really have to move with the times. If you’re trying to reach young folks, you have to know what they’re spending their time reading, watching, talking about, etc. — but almost all these activities are things that happen amongst friends. They’re not talking about college websites, but they are talking about a new video they saw. Connecting to a new audience sometimes means taking a different approach.

The top thing is allowing the audience to have input. Thoughts and opinions happen all the time, but agency is more powerful than any marketing campaign. It’s you deciding what’s important, not you being told what’s important.

Why does viral content work? It humanizes all of us, hitting at the basic themes that we interact with and identify with easily — things that are clever, funny, etc. — not numbers and figures. When it comes to higher ed, viral can take the shape of making administrators accessible, rethinking campus culture to make it more available, or using the things that make the college unique and fun and using that to showcase some form of important information.

HL: Some years back, Ze Frank made a video in which he compared trends in the web to waves in the ocean. I like to think of us as the surfer’s in his analogy. We’re not trying to claim this trend and we don’t expect it to last forever but we saw a wave and we wanted to ride it. We made something that was fun for ourselves and because of that it was fun for others. People respond to that.

I think stuff like this is important, like Ma’ayan said, in humanizing a community. It shows that we have a sense of humor, that we’re not stodgy, that we’ve got personality. Oberlin College is not a corporate-person. We’re just people-people. I think people really like seeing that.

That message is often stronger when it’s institutionally supported (not that I think Oberlin could ever officially support something like WTFSICO—part of its charm is that it’s renegade) so I do think people in higher ed need to take note. That’s why the work that Ma’ayan does at her real job—running official Facebook pages, Twitter accounts, Tumblr blogs, &c.—is so important. It shows that Oberlin College is both hip to trends and has personality.

GC: So, does this mean it’s OK to say “fuck” in higher ed marketing now? Some people get uptight and offended pretty easily, especially at universities. If the content works for our target audience, should we just ignore the naysayers?

MP: I don’t think that cursing is a necessary part of any situation. I didn’t so much as say a single curse word til I was in college. I was just fine without them in my life, and to be honest, I don’t use them that much anyways. Language is richer and more creative if you have to find another word to use.

The only reason why this sort of thing works when trying to speak to large groups is that it puts people at ease (contradictory, I know) because it gives a decided air of informality to the content. It encourages our users to say what they want, in as stripped-down a manner as possible, and share exactly how they feel, and in every manner, they can be uncensored.

To me (foodie at the core), this is taking our normal well-balanced diet that has been told to us will make us healthier and live longer and injecting a touch of spice or heavy cream to your average meal. I see this sort of “rogue” website as a underground supplement to the delicious and nutritious planned marketing. Maybe this little fun taste will encourage a viewer to actually follow up on the statements on the site by clicking through to more official content (if there’s a relevant link to content submitted to us, we’re adding it — who said fun can’t also be educational?).

HL: I think, perhaps obviously, this sort of content needs to be gauged to your audience. If you’re a conservative Catholic college, for instance, your audience might be a little put off. But Obies have always been a little edgy, a little ahead of the trends, and totally irreverent, so I think this sort of site really appeals to most folks who love or will someday love Oberlin. It’s hard to say what the reaction to this website would be if it were published by the college itself instead of two enthusiastic alumni. I think that’s something that could have consequence from a number of groups whose support is critical to the college. But I think it is important that universities are not afraid of content like this when it crops up organically.

Check out my follow-up analysis post: WTF FTW Part 2: The Real Internet

A Snapshot of Why Newspapers Keep Failing on the Web

I don’t normally read gossip columns, and I try to resist the siren song of Boston.com’s linkbait content, but for some reason, I clicked on a headline labeled “Sofia Vergara’s Boston snapshot.” I don’t know why. I don’t even watch “Modern Family.” Perhaps the early hour made me more vulnerable.

What I found was not a Boston snapshot, but rather a snapshot of the continued failings of newspapers on the web. Let’s dig in.

  • The article does not link to the photo it references. Repeat: the article does not link to the photo it references. There is a 276-word piece of web content all about a celebrity’s photograph, with no link or even a hint as to where I might find it. Really?
  • The article says Vergara “posted a picture from her trip on her website.” Her website? Only in as much as the Twitter stream embedded on her SofiaVergara.com homepage counts as posting a photo on her website. More appropriately, the photo was tweeted via Who Say, social media platform of the stars. The story could have simply read, “tweeted a photo from her trip.”I’ve blogged about this before, so I’ll just quote myself: “In this new world of blended media, retweeting and link sharing, reporters should be able to do a basic parsing of content to determine its origin. As those [social media outlets] continue to proliferate, and thus merit reporting by mainstream media, an understanding of the differences … will be critical.” It may seem like an insignificant detail that doesn’t warrant so much attention about its accuracy, but since so much reporting nowadays comes via social media content, reporters have a responsibility to become more savvy and, thus, more accurate. Don’t dumb it down for me; tell it like it is.
  • This is, pretty transparently, an excerpted section from the “Names” column as it ran the newspaper, published as its own story (coming in at 276 words) in order to maximize ad impressions and enable more relevant sharing. However, wouldn’t such a bite-sized and timely piece of content be better shared via the “Names” blog?  Well, apparently not. The blog took the long weekend off and was last updated on Friday.
  • You can tell when the Globe’s deadline was, because Vergara posted a much better (and less blurry) “Boston snapshot” just before 7 p.m. yesterday. Dead tree deadline makes for DOA web content.

You might think, these are all highly avoidable problems. Or you might think, these issues are small potatoes in the big scheme of things and not worth complaining about. But while the Boston Globe has made progress in some respects toward a “web-first” model (most prominently with regard to breaking news), there are larger, systemic issues that prevent those successes from trickling down to other sections of the paper, as this “snapshot” illustrates. And if this is the easy stuff, and papers aren’t even equipped to get this stuff right…

It comes down to relevance. And everything detailed above reeks of a publication that is not equipped to be relevant.

The Earth Moves in Real-Time

Earlier this afternoon, a 5.8 magnitude earthquake centered in Virginia shook the East Coast. Talk of the quake quickly filled up Facebook news feeds and Tweetdeck columns.

Shortly after the quake, Cornell University staffer Aaron Hill tweeted a link to a video he shot of Cornell’s Dr. Muawia Barazangi, a professor of seismology, explaining what happened during today’s quake:

What’s interesting to note is that Hill’s job is not in public relations or communications; he’s a web developer. So is Jason Woodward, who was with Hill as he shot the video, and whose photo of the seismograph in Cornell’s Snee Hall was shared via the university’s Twitter account.

This is awesome. This is exactly what higher ed needs to be doing: we need to capitalize on our intellectual assets to add context to the events that transpire in the world. I discussed this in depth in my talk on higher ed in real-time at #140conf Boston last year.

It made me think: one year later, how much closer are higher ed news offices to being real-time operations? Granted, it’s a little tough in this current situation (as I am finding out) with it being summer and many faculty not yet on campus, but I crowdsourced some examples (thanks, Mike and Ryan).

So, we’re getting there, hopefully. Events such as this — which basically dominated the online conversation of an entire coast for a good few hours — are incredible opportunities to add value to the chatter with information and context and demonstrate our relevance. Knowledge FTW!

I have to admit – at first, I was chagrined that two of the best examples I saw came via web developers — where are the news offices?? But, as Jason reminded me, “everyone’s a content person.” Going real-time in higher ed is not just dependent on our news offices cranking out content in a timely, relevant fashion; it also requires leveraging the members of our community who are doing the same (as Cornell did with Jason’s photo). Real-time knows no department or role. It is just happening. And we have to keep up.

Using Authentic Voice in Social Media

On Apr. 6, I was fortunate to be a part of a panel co-organized by the Boston chapters of the American Marketing Association and Social Media Club on using authentic voice in social media. The panel, moderated by Ja-Naé Duane, featured Mike Troiano, Mike Langford and Luke Penney. Here is the video from the event:

As a follow-up, I wanted to share a few thoughts here about what I feel are the critical components of an authentic voice in social media:

  • Consistency: You need to live up to the expectations you set. Do you deliver on promises? This even relates to style — do your voice and tone remain consistent, as well? Imagine trying to listen to someone who can’t modulate their voice properly. Yeah.
  • Offline alignment: As an extension of this, who you are online should hew closely to who you are offline. If you are a markedly different type of organization on Twitter than you are on the phone or at the customer service window, these mixed perceptions will start to bleed into one another and affect overall perception of your organization.
  • Honesty: Say what you mean, and mean what you say. Simply put. Dishonesty is fairly easy to parse out via social media.
  • Confidence: Relatedly, believe what you say, and say what you believe. Are you firm in what you stand for and what you offer? If challenged, be prepared to defend and stick to your guns. Wishy-washy doesn’t play. Your audience may stay or go depending on whether or not you stand for something that appeals to them, but that’s the point, right?
  • Be true to yourself: Remember the ultimate goals and identity of your organization; your goals and identity through social media should directly tie into those.
  • Be true to your community: Foster mutual respect. If people ask questions, listen and respond. Address reasonable concerns seriously. Understand what is important to them and where they are coming from. Connect with them on that level.
  • Passion: Someone raised the question of what is promotion in the context of authenticity, and I think that passionate advocacy, even if it is in promotion of an event or service, supports authenticity. This requires the people representing that voice to have the personal buy-in that translates to genuine passion around the brand.
  • Know the lay of the land: In social media, the barriers are lowered both between you and your audience and between your audience and you (that is somewhat redundant wording, but I did so purposefully to emphasize that it goes both ways). Be aware of your environment and what those lowered barriers mean for you, and be ready.
  • Responsibility: Social media is not fun or frivolous. Managing the social media voice of an organization is a significant responsibility to bear. Understanding that and taking it seriously increases your chances of doing it right.

What else constitutes authentic voice in social media?

Marketing the Weather

Since forever, I’ve been a weather nerd. Perhaps it came from growing up in South Florida, surrounded by thunderstorms, hurricanes and other tropical phenomena. I still vividly recall when I first learned how the Florida afternoon thunderstorm cycle gets conjured each hot and steamy day — when the easterly sea breeze off the ocean collides with the westerly wind from the Everglades. Boom. No, that wasn’t thunder; that was the sound of my young mind being blown by knowledge. Where did I learn this? From my local TV meterologist.

Flash forward several years, and I’m in New England, where weather prognostication (both professional and amateur) is serious business. With more seasons and thus more flavors of weather to deal with, it can’t be easy to be a meteorologist in Boston. When snow is due, an eager or beleaguered public (depending on personal preference and what part of winter we’re in) hang on every inch in your snowfall prediction. Lately, with the transition to warm weather being torturously slow in the wake of a wearying winter, any forecast with a high below 50 or the hint of a flurry draws out the pitchforks.

But whether it’s 70 and sunny or a snowpocalypse, the local TV meteorologists are out there in force, engaging with the masses. And by “there,” I don’t mean their TV stations. I mean the internet.

True Confessions

Before going any further, let me come clean: I am a category 2 weather nerd. I’ve got the National Weather Service forecast for my ZIP code bookmarked. I’ve been known to click on a forecast discussion or two — caps, jargon and all. I probably check the forecast at least a half dozen times in any given day. But despite these proclivities, I know I am not the biggest weather nerd around.

While I’m coming clean, let me add the following: barring an extraordinary emergency, I don’t want TV news, local or cable.

Partly Nerdy

I think it all began when my friend Liz — also a weather nerd, perhaps Category 1 — began evangelizing to me about the WHDH weather blog. She swore by the forecasts of Pete Bouchard, as conveyed not through the Ch. 7 newscasts, but through the blog. So, while I continued to mainline National Weather Service forecasts, I often supplemented them with a WHDH weather blog chaser. I came to appreciate it for the human voice it brought to my weather experience.

As I got more involved with Twitter, I began following both Pete Bouchard and Dylan Dreyer on Twitter. Pete hews pretty close to all weather, all the time in his tweet stream, but he’s great at responding to people and having a back and forth. Dylan is more prone to talk about food, TV or her dog, which is also fun.

This was all well and good, but I soon got introduced to the man who would become my Twitter weather boyfriend: New England Cable News’ Matt Noyes.

@MattNoyesNECN

Noyes wears his nerdiness and unabashed love of all things weather on his sleeve. He throws around terms like Norlun trough as casually as most people talk about cold fronts. (He’s even got the second result in Google for the term.) He teaches his 2,600-plus Twitter followers words like graupel (soft snow pellets) and rejoices when they pick them up. He hosts a technical live webcast every weeknight, in which more than a hundred people can regularly be found watching Noyes parse raw weather data aloud. He is an avid tweeter, sharing everything from real-time weather info for specific towns, props to fellow NECN staff, Wendy’s drive-thru angst or moments spent with his dog. He’s not afraid to get technical and detailed about everything from conflicting forecast models to cloud formations, but he is very good at explaining weather phenomena (most recently when the report about radioactive rain in Massachusetts came out last week).

So, what is Matt Noyes, really? He’s an influencer. He’s an expert. All of those annoying social media titles, they probably apply. But above all, he’s a weather man. That what matters, and his expertise and the manner in which he uses the web to share it is what makes him stand out. When I want to know what’s happening with New England weather, he has become my go-to source, almost completely because of the way he uses Twitter.

Nerdiness Sells

Last week, I read a remarkable weather blog post on the local CBS affiliate’s website. Here’s an excerpt:

The new 12 Z GFS has a much stronger storm over Nantucket Friday night with rain and wind. Rain changing to a burst snow overnight and Early Saturday before pulling away with strong WNW on the backside . Quite a different look from it’s ooZ weaker morning solution.

But wait, there’s more!

I leave you with GFS ensemble 500 mb for Friday April 1st. Look at  the eastern trough in place, the merging of the polar and subtropical jetstreams.

What???

Before we get into an uproar about how Joe Joyce isn’t blogging for his audience, please recall my statement above about how weather in New England is serious business. Because it’s true. Everyone, to one degree or another, is obse–let’s call it enthusiastic. They’re enthusiastic about the weather. For the most enthusiastic of disciples in any given field, nerds are sages. They are revered, and they are indulged. We want to learn from them, to stoke the flame of our fervor. The above babble about the GFS ensemble (which, no, is not a new boy band called Guys From Southie) is just what people didn’t know they wanted to know.

What's this? Who cares? It's awesome.

In broadcast news, where complex stories are diluted to the most accessible 15 or 30-second news droplet, I think it’s fascinating that we can get such an in-depth look at what goes into the weather forecast through the forecasters’ online outposts. On the web, we get a multidimensional peek beneath the hood of the preparation, the science and the analysis that goes into what is just a two-minute segment on the evening news.  It makes local weather a real multichannel experience, with each channel bringing something for which it is uniquely suited. TV gives the high-impact overview, blogs provide added depth and insight, and Twitter is where they chat about it all and answer questions one-on-one. And this doesn’t just happen for the epic snowstorms. This happens for your typical spring day, too.

These forecasters, by simply being their nerdy selves, are doing a hell of a great job sharing their expertise and building community around weather, but also marketing their stations. Because Matt Noyes wins on Twitter, I have heightened respect for NECN, even though TV news is not part of my media consumption habit. I’ll hype him to people who do watch TV news. And when The Big One looms and I feel compelled to immerse myself in the news surrounding the next huge storm, you can get which station I’ll be tuning in to.

So, lesson learned from the Twitter meteorological corps? Own your nerdiness. Revel in it. The people who care will love you for it. And around here, hate mail after the 12th storm of the winter is just how we show our love.

Ignite Spatial: Experience is the New Place

On March 24, I had the pleasure of speaking at Ignite Spatial. My presentation — “Experience is the New Place: The Next Evolution of Check-Ins” — was more or less a roundup of the ideas I began exploring in my “Checking In” blog series.

The event was great. GIS is outside my expertise and comfort level, so it was pretty fascinating to hear a majority of presentations that delved into the more technical aspects of space and place.

I learned about an awesome 3-D mapping initiative for Washington D.C. (and the hazards of driving around the nation’s capital in a vehicle with a camera mounted to the roof), how a citizen armed with data and the internet can affect civic change amidst the snowiest winter in recent memory, how members of the GIS field are using social media to learn and connect with colleagues, what some of my colleagues at Tufts are doing to create an Open GIS portal and how citizens can become urban mechanics and gain a sense of ownership of their neighborhoo with the help of an app called SeeClickFix.

Kudos to Guido Stein for organizing yet another awesome Ignite event. We were joking that his next event needs to be an Ignite Ignite, where we’ll all give five minute, 20-slide talks about delivering Ignite talks! You never know, it could happen…

Checking In: What’s Next?

As I wrap up this blog series, I look back on what I wrote in the first post: “The idea of location is morphing such that it really means experience.” As checkins and their applications continue to morph and evolve, what’s next? What might we see in the year to come? Rohit Bhargava has a great outlook on some of the biggest opportunities awaiting businesses and marketers, from geotagged content mashups to augmentation of live events to geosocial applications for social good, and of course further exploration of how brands can leverage LBS to offer deals and get more customers.

Looking ahead, here are some of the challenges I see:

Checkins as the grappling hooks for social experiencesSocial Media Explorer recently featured a great post about how the networks are trying to leverage checkins and Twitter to create more of a social experience around television viewing, adding context and fostering interaction. As author Adam Helweh explains, it will be a continued learning curve for networks to learn how to do this more broadly and meaningfully.

On the higher ed side of things, Tim Nekritz recently wrote about Whrrl, which has a lesser profile than some of its LBS cohorts but shows promise in its function of  ”building societies” of people with common interests, as indicated by their checkins. Nekritz also details how Whrrl was used by one university during its graduation ceremony to “create an additional level of connectivity and excitement to the event.” Will the use of checkins for community building gain more prevalence?

Content is changing – From gamification to appification to transmedia, these blended, multichannel content experiences – rich in dynamic context – are carving out an increasingly larger niche, and becoming increasingly core to content engagement strategies. What does this mean? Well, it means that context is getting its due, and content producers need to adjust and embrace. Expectations are shifting. Actions and check-ins aren’t going to be enough; there has to be meaning behind them.

To this end, Clinton Bonner recently blogged about a new geosocial service called Intersect that focuses on the human story context behind check-ins. In the post, Bonner also wonders about the higher value of Foursquare check-ins with added user context, and if the service might try to create a game incentive around context-laden check-ins.

Semantic web and content organization - I will readily admit that I don’t have as good of a grasp on the semantic web as I should, but I know enough to see that there is a tremendous opportunity to apply the principles of the semantic web to location based services. The goal of the semantic web is to make data meaningful, and the latent power of the data we generate from our everyday web transactions is just beginning to be realized. Alex Iskold of GetGlue spoke to ReadWriteWeb about how he is leveraging the semantic web with his product. The newest version of Foursquare, 3.0, also begins to do this more effectively.

And it’s not just about the data that these services collect, but it’s also about the content they create. There are some efforts underway to organize content assets (specifically movies and TV programs) as a response to “the growing complexity of managing content assets across rapidly multiplying digital channels.”

Tagging – In a previous post, I undercut my love for QR codes with the admission that I don’t think they are the fullest iteration of tagging. I’m convinced there’s a lot of evolution yet to come. (Although Hamilton Chan, in a recent Mashable post, makes the case for widespread QR adoption.)  PSFK — a research and consulting firm that is always churning out insightful reports and sharing great information — recently released a Future of Mobile Tagging report (sponsored by Microsoft Tag) with lots of forward-looking ideas on how to employ tags. “By bridging the online-offline divide with a click of a mobile phone button, mobile tags can drive a brand or product’s awareness,” reads the report’s introduction. “In this report we look at how companies are using competitions and gaming to engage a new audience.”

Segmenting of networks – While some services are connected (like Foursquare and Facebook Places) others (like, Redpint and Foursquare) aren’t (yet). If I’m having a beer while watching a season premiere of my favorite show at the local bar, what am I supposed to do? We are leading multichannel lives, but a lot of our time is being spent in walled gardens. Also, if I’m a brewer, I need to try to get a handle on how my product fares on both Redpint and Untapped. If I’m a TV producer, what kind of interactions are happening on GoMiso versus GetGlue? How can I wrap my brain around how my product fares across a host of services?

So what? – There is a huge need/opportunity to educate consumers on the benefits of using LBS services. to overcome the “what’s the point?” factor. The best way to do this is to 1) create more benefits to using LBS services and 2) communicate them. Sounds simple, but it seems fairly difficult for some businesses/marketers to execute.

Through the Lens of Dens

Why not close things out with some parting words from the king of checkins himself, Foursquare founder Dennis Crowley?

In a recent and very insightful interview with Crowley, Om Malik described location “a contextual vector for data,” which is just a fancy way of saying is that location (and, by extension, experience) gives data meaning. This goes back to the importance of the semantic web in making LBS really powerful, and Crowley’s thinking is right up that alley.

Conveniently, the heart of Crowley’s remarks relate to the three things I earlier stated that content needs to thrive: order, community and mobility.

People are giving us one or two or three pieces of data everyday about the places they go to. We can cut that data up. This is a new way to look at your neighborhood based on the places you’ve been, and your friends have been to. Places that people like you go to. … The hard thing to figure out is its context. You’ve got the phone as the center [of the network], so it’s collecting all these data points. The next big thing to figure out is what is the contextual relevance of all that? Are you moving? Are you with friends? Where are you? Where have you been? Where are you headed?

Where are we headed? Bigger question: will we check in when we get there?

I will giving a 5-minute talk about these topics at the Ignite Spatial event in Boston on March 24. If you’re in the area, register and come watch! There’s a great lineup of folks talking all things location and geospatial.

Photo by electricwindows / Flickr Creative Commons

Checking In: Dynamic Context

Fourth in a series of posts about the rise of check-in services

Last fall, I was reading an interview with content strategist Margot Bloomstein where she observed the following about the future of content strategy:

Expect to see more of a focus on dynamic context as content strategy addresses location-based experiences.

That phrase, “dynamic context,” blew my mind. It better expressed something I had been explaining as “hypertext for real life” — basically, the enhancement of our everyday lives via real-time content and information accessed through a range of embedded interfaces. (Think VH1′s “Pop-Up Video.”) Foursquare is one such interface; a QR code is another. So checking in is like turning the key on an engine of information.

The ‘Physical World Web’

Following October’s GeoM summit in Boston (which I was sad to miss), Jeff Holden of Pegalo (makers of Whrrl) blogged about this phenomenon, which he calls the “physical world web” (PWW):

The PWW… is about blurring the line between online and offline by tightly coupling two things:  a person’s real-time context and all of the information available on the Web.  By “tightly coupling” I don’t simply mean using a person’s location to make searches location-relevant.  I mean a new set of user interactions that simply didn’t make sense before we had real-time user context, like location.

The check-in, says Holden, is one of those interactions. Its power lies in using data to unlock physical-world opportunities, whether it’s a business promotion or chance encounter with a friend.

The check-in converts location to place, which is far more semantically rich than simple location, and it is real-time — it means “I’m here now.”

A history of an individual’s check-ins “are the physical world equivalent of a Web clickstream,” says Holden — or, as he called it in his talk at Where 2009, a “footstream.” This data “can be accessed in context, in the moment, e.g. to provide highly personalized recommendations for the real world.”

The Multichannel World

The underlying framework for a successful dynamic context is a rich and connected community. “The social web simply shortens the distance between us,” Dave Allen of NORTH was quoted as saying at Portland State University’s Digital Marketing Conference in December, and location/experience-based services thrive on our connectivity.

Stowe Boyd has some great thoughts about the value of “between-ness” — which he defines as “a measure of how short are the chains that connects a person to the totality of the network” – and how these services enhance it:

It’s a virtuous cycle: by adjusting my position in the network — by following and unfollowing — I improve the diversity and quality of readage I see, and by passing along the best of what comes along, my followers are better off. My actions improve their respective positions in the network too. And those of their followers, and so on. I am actually improving the entire network, by better positioning myself.

Why this, why now? Because the new reality is multichannel. As Tamsen McMahon recently observed on Twitter, “The new reality: currently carrying on a conversation with one person on three different platforms.” The hypertext is all around us, and we are developing tools to leverage — and keep up — with this new reality.

Teressa Iezzi, editor of Creativity magazine, told NPR:

Now, with smart phones and location awareness and tablets, you’ve got multiple screens speaking to each other. I think you’re going to see a lot of the most interesting things in advertising happening with that.

And advertisers are already taking advantage of this by creating multichannel campaigns that are not only interactive, but immersive, in addition to the ability to check in to a brand.

But how do we define where these interactions are taking place?

Experience vs. Location

In the first post of this series, I said: “The idea of location is morphing such that it really means experience.” And the power of these location/experience-based services is in providing dynamic context to our experiences.

A new Android app, Hashable, is centered around this premise, providing a new way to “check in” to the people we meet, log information and grab more context about them in real time.

Drew Davis of Tippingpoint Labs recently provided a great example of how business can be transformed when there is rich dynamic context. California wine country, apparently, is all over LBS, making them a valuable way for visitors to navigate the different offerings and chart an itinerary, and creating a new playing ground for competition among the wineries. It’s great for business. For the tourists, their wine country experience gains a whole new level of context that drives their decision making.

Of course, the idea checking in quickly became something that transcended physical location and embraced shared experience (see: snowpocalypse, heatpocalypse and any other flavors of weather-pocalypse — heck, a brand is a type of experience). “Squarendipity” is an example of dynamic context, where information received from a geosocial service influences your actions in the physical world — in this case, going to find your friend who just checked in at the Starbucks across the street. Also, look at Runkeeper, Tripit, Redpint and the like. Running, traveling and even drinking have — like TV shows and outings to the bar — become experiences that are enhanced both socially and informationally by the web.

Even business applications of Foursquare aren’t bound to GPS coordinates — this December Mashable post outlined multiple ways to use Foursquare for marketing without a location. Some suggested ways include creating a fake location that raises awareness around an issue or idea or building your friend network to broaden exposure to your tip and to-do content. Both are great examples of creating dynamic context (particularly, to Bloomstein’s point, as part of a content strategy).

Whither the QR Code?

In November, Hamilton Chan blogged for Mashable about our increasingly hypertextual world. QR codes are just one example of what he called “context-sensitive marketing.”

In addition to purchasing convenience, a real-world hyperlink can trigger multimedia or crowdsourced wisdom that can help you in a pinch. Imagine, for example, needing to re-thread the belts on a child’s car seat, but not having the manual in front of you to show you how. There is no need to Google the product or scavenge through your file cabinet for the manual; just scan the QR code and have the manual or a how-to video appear right on your phone.

QR codes have found a wide range of uses, from mobile web business cards to TV commercials. Honestly? While I love QR codes, I am not betting the bank on them. I think they are the first iteration of what will eventually become a more sophisticated interface for adding dynamic context to the physical world. They are important to explore now, to see how these new interfaces work and what the potential applications are. But will we be using QR codes in five years the same way we do today, only with much wider adoption? I don’t think so. The principles will be there in wider adoption, but not QR codes per se. Look, for example, at how this Old Navy ad employs the app Shazam — it’s already happening.

Something that really excites me, about which I have done some preliminary geeky chatting with my friend and mobile expert Dave Olsen about, is near-field communications. Dynamic context should be smarter; it should intuit where you are and what you need, based on settings you configure. Near-field communications will remove the need for a human to electively take action to acquire information. It will be like flicking a switch that reveals all of the dynamic context already around you. If you want it to, information will find you.

Coming next: Conclusion, and what’s next for check-ins?

Photo by laihiu/Flickr Creative Commons